The argument against Chelsea signing Kai Havertz

By | March 31, 2022

Kai Havertz is a generational talent, at that place’due south no denying it, and he would arguably get into most, if not all, starting XIs in Europe.

A stellar 2017/xviii season saw Havertz appear onto the earth phase, grabbing 17 goals and three assists in 33 Bundesliga starts.

This season started slowly, but in 2020 he has shown his course to an nearly incomprehensible level for someone then young.

He has 21 goals and assists in just xx games (in all comps) since the turn of the twelvemonth, and it’s this truly incredible course that has sparked links to Europe’s elite sides.

At just 21, Havertz would fit the general age contour of Chelsea’due south current crop of talented youngsters,
simply there are several reasons the Blues shouldn’t get difficult for the Leverkusen attacker.

What? Ok, hear our reasoning.

Plentiful supply of attackers already at Chelsea

Whilst Havertz would likely exist an instant success for Chelsea in the Premier League, the amount of options already at the lodge hateful he really isn’t needed.

Havertz’s ability to play as a No. 9, No. ten, No. viii and even broad right if needed, is then unique for someone his historic period, but the options in those positions at Chelsea are already so stacked.

CFC midfield options

Jorginho Billy Gilmour
Northward’Golo Kante Ruben Loftus-Cheek
Mateo Kovacic Mason Mount
Ross Barkley Callum Hudson-Odoi
Christian Pulisic Hakim Ziyech
Tammy Abraham Timo Werner
Tino Anjorin

In his starting XI next flavour Lampard already has to pick only six starters from the list above. Arguably there are already too many options there already, and if Havertz joined and so yous’d imagine it would hateful the end of a career at Chelsea for at least i player from that list.

Popular:   Five news stories show Barcelona's meltdown is getting worse

Havertz v current options

Havertz has mostly played as a lone striker since the Bundesliga restart, and if you look at his numbers versus Chelsea’southward new signing Timo Werner, he pales in comparison.

Werner has 34 goal contributions in the Bundesliga in 19/twenty; Havertz has 18, and Havertz’s ii.i shots P90 is far less than Werner’southward 3.ix, as well as Abraham’s 3.4 P90.

Werner, and arguably Abraham, would be the better option for the Blues as a No. 9 and therefore it would likely mean Havertz would be utilised in a No. 10 role if he was to sign. With Mountain, Loftus-Cheek and Ziyech almost expected to fill the hole at attacking midfield next flavor, let’s compare Havertz’s stats to theirs.

No. 10 Options 19/twenty league stats

Thespian Assists Key Pass P90
Havertz vi
Mount 4 one.7
Loftus-Cheek ane.6
Ziyech 13 4.3

Havertz’south goalscoring ability is far greater than the iii aforementioned options, nevertheless, in this Chelsea side, that role is left to the fundamental striker, and with Werner and Abraham in the side, it’s likely that cosmos would be the master focus for the selected No. 10.

Whilst Havertz’s two.vii central passes P90 this flavor is better than Mountain’s one.7 and Loftus-Cheek’south (from 2018/xix), it is far inferior to Ziyech’s incredible four.3 P90 in the Eredivisie this campaign.

Frank Lampard already has a plethora of options

Havertz may have historic period on his side in comparison to Ziyech, but the Moroccan’due south creativity far outweighs the German’south (13 assists to 6 in domestic league competitions this flavour), and this is the central issue in the Chelsea attack that needs improving.

Popular:   Hungary vs France (1-1) Jun 19, 2021 Player Ratings and Stats

Although Havertz would be an upgrade on both Mount and Loftus-Cheek, Chelsea’s recent focus on promoting English youth would be compromised, and money needs to be spent elsewhere in the squad.

Signings needed elsewhere

Left-back is the key area that has been identified every bit the weak spot in the Chelsea side, and therefore the £80m+ that would be needed to learn the services of Havertz should be used to sign a new left-back.


Who should Chelsea sign to address their left-back problem?

Furthermore, transfer links to Ajax’southward Andre Onana as a replacement for Kepa Arrizabalaga take lingered in the distance throughout the pause in football game, and a left-back and Onana would cost at least £50m.

Despite the transfer ban that prevented any signings final summertime, Chelsea don’t accept an unlimited cash flow, and prioritising a left-back, especially because the options they already have in attack, would be a amend use of coin than to pursue Havertz.