Post-Shot Expected Goals: What is it, and why is it different from Expected Goals?

By | March 31, 2022

While some people are still taking time to become their heads around Expected Goals, the analytics customs are pushing onward to the side by side development.

Post-Shot Expected Goals
(or Expected Goals on Target, to use Opta’southward definition) makes the distinction from Expected Goals in 1 very articulate way.

A robust Expected Goals model takes the shot position, the bending of the shot in reference to the goal, whether the endeavour was a header or a shot (headers are, notoriously, scored less) and whether at that place are defenders between the actor and the goal. These models are based upon tens of thousands of shots gathered over an all-encompassing period of time.

This provides a valuation for every shot based on the historical precedent of the likelihood of shots from that position and those variables remaining true.

But what Expected Goals doesn’t do is establish what happens to the shot when the ball has left the player’s pes. What Postal service-Shot Expected Goals does is take the shot quality (ie what would be an xG loftier-tariff run a risk) and combine it with what really happened – the destiny of the shot.


Here’s Mohamed Salah against Chelsea from 2018/19. From the position of this shot and the bending towards goal, plus the actor endmost, the xG for this chance would be around 0.02, meaning one in every 50 shots from this position, you could await to go in.

Just once the ball leaves Salah’southward pes, it’s non trickling into Kepa’s arms, nor is it going into the stand. Information technology’due south heading direct into the elevation corner of the internet. Therefore the Mail service-Shot Expected Goals on this try is likely to be much closer to 0.55, or 0.threescore – because the shot is going into a position of the goal where, mostly, shots go in.

Popular:   How Tuchel has transformed Kovacic at Chelsea

WHY Do We Take THIS?

It’s a step forrard for 2 reasons.

Firstly, we can more hands identify
how proficient a forrad is at shooting.

At the moment if a histrion is exceeding his Expected Goals, it is mostly regarded that his number volition return to the expected total over fourth dimension – and this is generally the case.

Just with Postal service-Shot Expected Goals (PSxG) we can and then compare that number with Expected Goals and assess the quality of a players finishing. if a actor’s PSxG exceeds their xG it means that their shooting is better and more accurate than their shooting position would advise.

Merely information technology is besides useful for assessing goalkeepers and it should be obvious why. If simply using Expected Goals to assess a goalkeeper it doesn’t take into account whether the shot even striking the target at all. It as well doesn’t consider whether a shot from a high xG tariff position was smashed into the corner, or was scuffed into the keeper’s artillery.

Post-Shot Expected Goals, therefore, looks at the likelihood of the goalkeeper in question
saving a shot based on the PSxG of where the shot concluded up.
Clearly this is much more than beneficial is assessing a goalkeeper’s shot-stopping ability.

PSxG puts the goalkeeper on the spot; it sidelines clean sheets, or saves P90, or save percentages, because those could be as a outcome of a solid defence in forepart of them. with PSxG, however, it’southward on the keepers to save the shots. And this volition likely become a more naturally-used statistic for goalkeepers in the years to come up.

Popular:   Man Utd 3-2 Liverpool, 2010: Berbatov's overhead kick is a thing of genuine beauty